visa refusal

Requesting an extension of time to appeal to the AAT - is this possible?

Earlier last month we provided an initial consultation to a couple who had been refused their applications for citizenship (based on identity). As their refusal letters said they had 28 days to appeal the refusal decision to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) they sought our advice and assistance with any possible next steps as it appeared they had missed an important deadline.

During the initial consultation and upon review of their documents and consideration of the circumstances that led to them missing the AAT deadline, we advised them that they were actually able to apply for an extension of time to make an application to the AAT. They engaged our services to apply for an extension of time, and ultimately, this was consented to by the Minister’s solicitors. We are pleased to say that they have current matters before the AAT and we are representing them in their appeal applications. Had they not booked in for that initial consultation, it is likely that they would have been none the wiser of their rights to appeal.

In saying that, an extension of time to appeal is not available for all types of applications to the AAT, and even when it is an option, it isn’t always guaranteed. Keep reading for further information and clarification….

Appealing to the AAT

When the government makes a decision, for example, to refuse to grant a visa or to cancel a visa, the decision can usually be appealed to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). What this means is that the AAT is allowed to remake the decision. However, the AAT is only allowed to remake the decision if an application is made within a certain time frame.  Most of the time, if an application for review is made to the AAT outside the time frame, the AAT is not legally allowed to remake the decision. This limits your options to change the government’s decision.

However, there are some circumstances in which the AAT can extend the time limit. It varies according to the type of immigration decision.

This table summarizes what your options are in relation to extending time deadlines. Generally, it is very important to lodge your applications within the required time frames. There is no guarantee that an application for an extension will be granted.

Migration Decision

If the Minister’s decision is a ‘migration’ decision, the time limits are very strict. A ‘migration’ decision is a decision to refuse or cancel a visa, a refusal to approve a nomination of an occupation, activity or position, a decision to bar, refuse to approve or cancel the approval of a sponsor, or a decision relating to a security.

The time limit to apply to the AAT differs on the type of decision, and whether you are in immigration detention. In the decision letter, which you should have received, the time limit for review is explicitly stated.

The AAT has no power to extend the time limit here. The time limit starts to run when you are taken to have received notice of the decision (generally when the letter was delivered). If the time limit expires, the AAT has no legal ability to review the decision.

Refugee Decisions

If the Minister’s decision relates to refugees, the time limits for review are also very strict. Refugee matters include decisions to refuse or cancel protection visas, decisions that a protection finding would no longer be made about a person,

The time limits for these decisions are very tight. If you are not in immigration detention, the deadline is 28 days. If you are in immigration detention, the time limit is 7 working days. The clock starts to run on the day you are taken to have received notice of the decision, if you are not in immigration detention. If you are in immigration detention, the clock start to run on the first working day you are taken to have received notice of the decision (so if you receive the decision on a Saturday, the clock starts to run on the Monday).

If the time limit expires, there is nothing the AAT can do. They have no power to extend the time limit.

Character-Related Decisions

Sometimes, visas are cancelled because of ‘character concerns.’ That means that the Minister has decided that you don’t pass the ‘character test.’ This allows the Minister to refuse or cancel any type of visa under s 501 (for more information on s501, see our upcoming s501 Information Kit). The Minister might refuse to undo a mandatory cancellation on the basis that you fail the character test. The Minister might also refuse a protection visa on character grounds. They might also cancel a business visa under s134. All of these types of decisions are reviewable by the AAT.

If you are in Australia, and the Minister has made a decision to refuse or cancel your visa under s501, or has made a decision to not revoke a mandatory cancellation under s501CA, there is a very tight time limit for review. The clock begins to run the day after you receive notice of the decision, and is 9 days long. The AAT has no power to extend this time limit – if the application for review is not lodged within this time, then there is no route for the AAT to appeal the matter.

Things are slightly more lenient if you are not in Australia. If you are outside Australia when the Minister makes a decision to refuse or cancel your visa under s501, or has made a decision to not revoke a mandatory cancellation under s501CA, then the time limit is 28 days after receiving notification of the decision. If the time limit expires, you can apply to have it extended!

For decisions to refuse a protection visa on character grounds other than s501, or for decisions to cancel a business visa under s134, the time limit is 28 days after receiving notification of the decision. Once again, if the time limit expires, you can apply to have it extended.

Citizenship Decisions

If the government has made a decision to refuse to approve a person becoming an Australian citizen, then this is usually reviewable by the AAT. It depends on the specific section of the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 that the government relied upon to refuse the citizenship application. Your decision letter should tell you whether you can apply to the AAT.

The AAT can review your decision if you apply within 28 days after you receive the decision from the Department of Home Affairs. However, if you miss the deadline, you can apply to the AAT to extend the time limit.

Writing to request an extension of time

When requesting an extension of the time limit, the reasons for why the application is late must be included. You can make the request for the extension in several ways. You can make the request when you make your application for review online, or you can fill in an ‘application for extension of time’ form when you send your ‘application for review of decision’ form in on paper, or you can write an email or letter.

The AAT then sends the application for an extension of time to the relevant government department, who can either agree to it or choose to contest it. If they choose to agree to it, then generally the application is granted. If they choose to contest the application, the AAT holds a hearing before determining whether to approve the application for an extension of time.

Conclusion

If you have missed a deadline to apply for review to the AAT, and after reading this blog feel that you may be able to request an extension of time, we would encourage you to seek legal advice as you may still have review rights despite missing the deadline set out in your refusal or cancellation letter.

 Disclaimer: The contents do not constitute legal advice, are not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. You should seek legal advice or other professional advice in relation to any particular matters you may have. Information is correct as at 15.11.2021 and subject to change without notice.

The verdict is in: soft (skills) is best!

Visa cancellations and visa refusals under the Migration Act 1958 are no soft topic.

Visa cancellations and visa refusals under the Migration Act 1958 are no soft topic.

soft skills

noun

  1. personal attributes that enable someone to interact effectively and harmoniously with other people.

If there’s a set of skills most lawyers lack, it’s soft skills.

That is why, soft skills are what distinguish Samuta McComber Lawyers from the rest. Our lawyers’ soft skills complement their hard-earned legal expertise and analytical intelligence, so that the truth of our clients stories can be better told to the decision makers who ultimately hold our clients’ lives in their hands.

Needless to say, when you are facing a possible visa cancellation under s501 of the Migration Act 1958 or have received a non-revocation outcome by a delegate of the Minister of Home Affairs (and you intend on appealing that decision to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ( AAT ) ), it is in your best interests to engage lawyers whose expertise is complemented by excellent soft skills. The following are the top 3 reasons why:

  1. the character-related provisions (s116 and s501) of the Migration Act 1958 is a complex area of law - not all lawyers have sound knowledge or experience in this niche area of immigration law;

  2. the ramifications for a visa refusal or visa cancellation under s501 is permanent exclusion from returning to Australia - literally, a life long ban, with no exceptions whatsoever; and

  3. when appearing at the AAT in relation to a s501 visa cancellation, the lawyers for the Minister of Home Affairs will play an active role in the proceedings (they will be at the final hearing to make submissions, examine and cross-examine the Applicant and the evidence relied on). The Minister for Home Affairs is of course represented by the Australian Government Solicitor or a top-tier law firm (currently Sparke Helmore Lawyers or Clayton Utz Lawyers).

Soft skills are our point of difference.

The following list are our top 7 sought after soft skills for our legal team:

#1: A genuine desire to help other people

#2: High personal integrity

#3: Humility and sensitivity

#4: Simplicity

#5: Empathetic listeners

#6: Confidence and persistence

#7: Discipline, dependability, and loyalty

Lets be real, representing clients whose visas have been refused or cancelled under s116 and s501 of the Migration Act 1958 is a tough gig! Professionally, the legislation is complex, yet specific, with strict deadlines and specific considerations. Personally, the nature of the work is highly emotive and demanding, with daily exposure to clients’ family units being torn apart by the threat of (or actual) deportation and individuals being removed from the only home (country) they’ve ever known.

The reality of the legal consequences for our clients and their loved ones drive our personal commitment to provide a level of representation:

  • that is driven by a passion to selflessly assist others, instead of being focussed on the money;

  • that demonstrates a deep commitment to honesty, loyalty, candor, transparency, and respect for others;

  • where we put ourselves in others’ shoes, seeing our clients’ situations, attitudes, and needs through their eyes;

  • that strives to be down-to-earth, communicating in simple language and avoid using “legalese”, recognising that our clients have unique styles, interests, and needs, having come from different walks of life;

  • that is confident and unshakable, refined only by respect and efficiency.

In our view, soft skills allows us to make better submissions on behalf of our clients, and we understand the knowledge gained through our deeper relationship with our client adds to our responsibility as their advocate as we observe and interpret our client’s story to the decision maker, whether it be the delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs or Member of the AAT .

After all, every one has a story to tell: their lives being more than the sum of their offences (character).